Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wells, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Milton A. Wells, Jr.'s motion for production of transcripts and other court records. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without requiring oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6786

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Milton A. Wells, Jr.'s motion for production of transcripts and other court records. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without requiring oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Wells, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Milton A. Wells, Jr.'s motion for production of transcripts and other court records. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without requiring oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6786

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MILTON A. WELLS, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-93-378-A, CA-96-1274-AM)

    Submitted:

    September 10, 1998

    Decided:

    September 24, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Milton A. Wells, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Katherine Mary Kelly,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying his motion for the production of transcripts and other court records. We
    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. United States v. Wells, Nos. CR-93-378-A; CA-961274-AM (E.D. Va. May 14, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like