Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Greg Givens v. Mitch Tolson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    In 3 sentences: Greg Givens appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its January 10, 2011 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Greg Givens v. Mitch Tolson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    In 3 sentences: Greg Givens appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its January 10, 2011 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1198

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    In 3 sentences: Greg Givens appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its January 10, 2011 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Greg Givens v. Mitch Tolson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    In 3 sentences: Greg Givens appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its January 10, 2011 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1198

    GREG GIVENS,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    MITCH TOLSON; RICHARD A. HAYHURST; RICHARD M. ADAMS, SR.;
    JANE DOE I; JOHN DOE I,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:10-cv-00909-HEH)

    Submitted:

    July 28, 2011

    Decided:

    August 1, 2011

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Greg

    Givens

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    (E.D.

    Va.

    Jan.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    10,

    Givens v. Tolson, No. 3:10-cv-00909-HEH

    2011).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like