Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Benitez, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Guillermo Benitez appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6069

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Guillermo Benitez appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Benitez, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Guillermo Benitez appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6069

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GUILLERMO BENITEZ, a/k/a Poppy, a/k/a Junior,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:94-cr-00052-RBS-1)

    Submitted:

    June 28, 2006

    Decided:

    July 25, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Guillermo Benitez, Appellant Pro Se.


    Laura Marie Everhart,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Guillermo Benitez appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2000) motion.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United

    States v. Benitez, No. 2:94-cr-00052-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16,


    2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like