Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rabah Muhammad Ali v. Peggy Jones Martin McDade Odis Temple Vernon Lee Bounds, 996 F.2d 1210, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 23, 1993. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to Rabah Muhammad Ali without merit. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's January 13, 1993 opinion in the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 996 F.2d 1210 Docket: 93-6165

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 23, 1993. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to Rabah Muhammad Ali without merit. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's January 13, 1993 opinion in the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Rabah Muhammad Ali v. Peggy Jones Martin McDade Odis Temple Vernon Lee Bounds, 996 F.2d 1210, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 23, 1993. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to Rabah Muhammad Ali without merit. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's January 13, 1993 opinion in the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    996 F.

    2d 1210

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Rabah Muhammad ALI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Peggy JONES; Martin McDade; Odis Temple; Vernon Lee
    Bounds, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 93-6165.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 7, 1993.
    Decided: June 23, 1993.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-92702-F)
    Rabah Muhammad Ali, Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Rabah Muhammad Ali appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on

    the reasoning of the district court. Ali v. Jones, No. CA-92-702-F (E.D.N.C.
    Jan. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like