Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cherisson v. United States, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Raymond Cherisson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal of his 1994 criminal case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Cherisson's motion as stated in its October 5, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-05-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7948

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Raymond Cherisson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal of his 1994 criminal case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Cherisson's motion as stated in its October 5, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Cherisson v. United States, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Raymond Cherisson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal of his 1994 criminal case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Cherisson's motion as stated in its October 5, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7948

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RAYMOND CHERISSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:94-cr-00097-14-BO)

    Submitted:

    March 28, 2007

    Decided:

    May 17, 2007

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Raymond Cherisson, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Raymond Cherisson appeals the district courts order
    denying Cherissons motion for leave to file out-of-time notice of
    appeal.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Cherisson

    v.

    United

    (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2006).

    States,

    No.

    5:94-cr-00097-14-BO

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like