Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ricky Turner v. Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Ricky Lamar Turner filed a § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles Commissioner which was denied by the district court. Turner then filed a motion for reconsideration which was also denied. Turner appealed both rulings. The appellate court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7646

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ricky Lamar Turner filed a § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles Commissioner which was denied by the district court. Turner then filed a motion for reconsideration which was also denied. Turner appealed both rulings. The appellate court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Ricky Turner v. Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Lamar Turner filed a § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles Commissioner which was denied by the district court. Turner then filed a motion for reconsideration which was also denied. Turner appealed both rulings. The appellate court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7646

    RICKY LAMAR TURNER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    COMMISSIONER, Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:12-cv-01303-TSE-JFA)

    Submitted:

    February 20, 2014

    Decided:

    February 26, 2014

    Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ricky Lamar Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ricky Lamar Turner appeals the district courts orders
    denying

    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    denying his motion for reconsideration.


    record and find no reversible error.
    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    (2012)

    complaint

    and

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    district

    court.

    Turner

    v.

    Commissioner, No. 1:12-cv-01303-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2013;


    Oct. 1, 2013).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like