Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Clyde Eugene Barrett v. Melinda Williams Linda Stanley Ken Bradley Teresa Hale, 46 F.3d 1122, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 19, 1995. It affirms the district court's denial of relief for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Clyde Eugene Barrett against four defendants. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 18, 1994 ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-01-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 46 F.3d 1122 Docket: 94-7271

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 19, 1995. It affirms the district court's denial of relief for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Clyde Eugene Barrett against four defendants. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 18, 1994 ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views1 page

    Clyde Eugene Barrett v. Melinda Williams Linda Stanley Ken Bradley Teresa Hale, 46 F.3d 1122, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 19, 1995. It affirms the district court's denial of relief for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Clyde Eugene Barrett against four defendants. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 18, 1994 ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    46 F.

    3d 1122

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Clyde Eugene BARRETT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Melinda WILLIAMS; Linda Stanley; Ken Bradley; Teresa
    Hale, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 94-7271.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.
    Decided Jan. 19, 1995.

    Clyde Eugene Barrett, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Barrett v. Williams, No. CA-94-882
    (W.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like