Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Collins v. Allsbrook, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randy Collins, a North Carolina inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Collins v. Allsbrook, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Randy Collins, a North Carolina inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6624

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Randy Collins, a North Carolina inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Collins v. Allsbrook, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randy Collins, a North Carolina inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6624

    RANDY F. COLLINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HARRY ALLSBROOK; MR. HARDY; CARLTON JONES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-96-255)
    Submitted:

    January 9, 1997

    Decided:

    January 21, 1997

    Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Randy F. Collins, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Randy F. Collins, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994)
    complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison
    Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Collins v. Allsbrook, No. CA-96-255 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like