Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Richardson v. York, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Danny Eugene Richardson. The court had reviewed Richardson's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Richardson's appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Richardson v. York, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Danny Eugene Richardson. The court had reviewed Richardson's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Richardson's appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6814

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Danny Eugene Richardson. The court had reviewed Richardson's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Richardson's appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Richardson v. York, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Danny Eugene Richardson. The court had reviewed Richardson's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Richardson's appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6814

    DANNY EUGENE RICHARDSON,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL W. YORK,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
    Judge. (CA-00-1212-1)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2001

    Decided:

    December 27, 2001

    Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Danny Eugene Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
    III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Danny Eugene Richardson seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 2001).
    district

    courts

    opinion

    We have reviewed the record and the


    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. York, No. CA-00-1212-1
    (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like