Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It summarizes that Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes appealed a district court order denying his motion to dismiss an indictment. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court order and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons cited in its order. Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials, and argument would not aid the decisional process. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6087

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It summarizes that Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes appealed a district court order denying his motion to dismiss an indictment. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court order and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons cited in its order. Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials, and argument would not aid the decisional process. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It summarizes that Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes appealed a district court order denying his motion to dismiss an indictment. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court order and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons cited in its order. Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials, and argument would not aid the decisional process. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6087

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RAFAEL JAIMES-JAIMES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (1:01-cr-00245-1)

    Submitted:

    March 12, 2009

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    SHEDD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    March 18, 2009

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes, Appellant Pro Se.


    Anna Mills Wagoner,
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Greensboro,
    North
    Carolina,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Rafael

    Jaimes-Jaimes

    appeals

    district

    denying his motion to dismiss the indictment.

    court

    order

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district court order and find no reversible
    error.
    United

    We affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.


    States

    v.

    Jaimes-Jaimes,

    Dec. 31, 2008).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    No.

    1:01-cr-00245-1

    (M.D.N.C.

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like