Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Adams, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Kenyatta Hasani Adams appealed a district court order that granted his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to grant the sentence reduction motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7862

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Kenyatta Hasani Adams appealed a district court order that granted his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to grant the sentence reduction motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Adams, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Kenyatta Hasani Adams appealed a district court order that granted his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to grant the sentence reduction motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7862

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    KENYATTA HASANI ADAMS,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1)

    Submitted:

    April 16, 2009

    Decided:

    April 23, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kenyatta Hasani Adams, Appellant Pro Se.


    Sherrie Scott
    Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenyatta

    Hasani

    Adams

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order granting his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and its


    subsequent order denying reconsideration.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.


    Adams,

    No.

    2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1

    (E.D.

    United States v.

    Va.

    filed Aug. 13, 2008; entered Aug. 18, 2008).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    July

    17,

    2008;

    We dispense with
    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like