Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hickman, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Stanley Hickman appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6077

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stanley Hickman appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Hickman, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stanley Hickman appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6077

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    STANLEY HICKMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:93-cr-00144-BO-3)

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2009

    Decided:

    June 8, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se.


    Anne Margaret Hayes,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stanley
    denying
    (2006).
    error.

    his

    Hickman

    motion

    filed

    appeals
    pursuant

    the
    to

    district
    18

    courts

    U.S.C.

    order

    3582(c)(2)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Hickman, No. 5:93-cr-00144-BO-

    3 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2008 & entered Dec. 23, 2008).
    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like