Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. White, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Carlos Shenick White appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling denying White's motion for a reduced sentence. The appellate court also denied White's request to have the court hearing transcript provided at government expense.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6532

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Carlos Shenick White appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling denying White's motion for a reduced sentence. The appellate court also denied White's request to have the court hearing transcript provided at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. White, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Carlos Shenick White appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling denying White's motion for a reduced sentence. The appellate court also denied White's request to have the court hearing transcript provided at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6532

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CARLOS SHENICK WHITE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (4:98-cr-00009-H-1)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2009

    Decided:

    June 25, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carlos Shenick White, Appellant Pro Se.


    Anne Margaret Hayes,
    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlos
    order

    denying

    Shenick
    his

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    White

    motion

    appeals

    filed

    at

    to

    18

    courts
    U.S.C.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    United States v. White, No. 4:98-cr-

    00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2009).


    transcript

    pursuant

    district

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    by the district court.

    the

    government

    expense.

    We deny Whites motion for


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like