Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Brown's motion to reduce his sentence. The district court had found no grounds to reduce Brown's sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7527

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Brown's motion to reduce his sentence. The district court had found no grounds to reduce Brown's sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Brown's motion to reduce his sentence. The district court had found no grounds to reduce Brown's sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7527

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL BROWN, a/k/a Rasheem Russell, a/k/a Hakeem Brown,
    a/k/a Rasheem Jamal Russell, a/k/a Michael Haseem Brown,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:01-cr-00023-CMH-1)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2009

    Decided:

    June 22, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


    Kathleen Marie Kahoe,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael
    denying

    his

    Brown

    motion

    for

    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).


    no reversible error.

    appeals

    the

    reduction

    of

    district
    sentence

    courts
    pursuant

    order
    to

    18

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    United States v. Brown, No. 1:01-

    cr-00023-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 14, 2008 & entered July 16,
    2008).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like