Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cox v. Dodson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Frank Cox filed a § 1983 complaint against various prison officials which was denied by the district court. Cox appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6183

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frank Cox filed a § 1983 complaint against various prison officials which was denied by the district court. Cox appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Cox v. Dodson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frank Cox filed a § 1983 complaint against various prison officials which was denied by the district court. Cox appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6183

    FRANK COX,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE P. DODSON; MR. BRAXTON; RICHARD S.
    WILSON; JIM COFFEE; PAM HINKLE; J. M. BEVINS;
    DAVID B. BEACH; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-96-5-R)
    Submitted:

    June 20, 1996

    Decided:

    July 1, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Frank Cox, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Cox v. Dodson, No. CA-96-5-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like