Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Jimmie Jones, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment sentencing Jimmie Allen Jones to three years in prison for violating the terms of his supervised release. Jones claimed the district court relied on improper hearsay evidence and its findings were not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. However, the Court of Appeals found no error after independently reviewing the record. The Court affirmed the district court's judgment order and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Jimmie Jones, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment sentencing Jimmie Allen Jones to three years in prison for violating the terms of his supervised release. Jones claimed the district court relied on improper hearsay evidence and its findings were not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. However, the Court of Appeals found no error after independently reviewing the record. The Court affirmed the district court's judgment order and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-03-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-4746

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment sentencing Jimmie Allen Jones to three years in prison for violating the terms of his supervised release. Jones claimed the district court relied on improper hearsay evidence and its findings were not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. However, the Court of Appeals found no error after independently reviewing the record. The Court affirmed the district court's judgment order and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Jimmie Jones, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment sentencing Jimmie Allen Jones to three years in prison for violating the terms of his supervised release. Jones claimed the district court relied on improper hearsay evidence and its findings were not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. However, the Court of Appeals found no error after independently reviewing the record. The Court affirmed the district court's judgment order and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-4746

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JIMMIE ALLEN JONES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District
    Judge. (CR-95-20)

    Submitted:

    February 24, 2000

    Decided:

    March 1, 2000

    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    David W. Frame, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Melvin
    W. Kahle, Jr., United States Attorney, Thomas O. Mucklow, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jimmie Allen Jones appeals the judgment order of the district
    court sentencing him to three-years imprisonment based on Jones
    violation of his supervised release terms.

    Jones claims that the

    court relied on improper hearsay evidence and that its findings


    were not supported by a preponderance of the evidence.

    Our inde-

    pendent review of the record reveals no error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm the judgment order of the district court.

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like