Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    United States v. Armstrong, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of David Lyndon Armstrong's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Armstrong's motion. The Court of Appeals also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Armstrong, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of David Lyndon Armstrong's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Armstrong's motion. The Court of Appeals also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6369

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of David Lyndon Armstrong's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Armstrong's motion. The Court of Appeals also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Armstrong, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of David Lyndon Armstrong's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Armstrong's motion. The Court of Appeals also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6369

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    DAVID LYNDON ARMSTRONG,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (7:03-cr-00107-F-1)

    Submitted:

    July 23, 2009

    Decided:

    July 29, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Lyndon Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes,


    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David
    order

    denying

    Lyndon
    his

    Armstrong

    motion

    to

    18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).


    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    appeals

    modify

    the

    his

    district

    sentence

    courts

    pursuant

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    See United States v.

    Armstrong, No. 7:03-cr-00107-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2009).


    dispense

    to

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like