Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Porter v. Murray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    George Allen Porter appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment in favor of Edward W. Murray in Porter's habeas corpus petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed substantially based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its November 28, 1995 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-8120

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Allen Porter appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment in favor of Edward W. Murray in Porter's habeas corpus petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed substantially based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its November 28, 1995 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Porter v. Murray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Allen Porter appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment in favor of Edward W. Murray in Porter's habeas corpus petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed substantially based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its November 28, 1995 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-8120

    GEORGE ALLEN PORTER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    EDWARD W. MURRAY,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-433-AM)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1996

    Decided:

    June 13, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curam opinion.
    George Allen Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    George Allen Porter appeals from a district court decision,
    issued after remand, granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent. We have reviewed the district court opinion and find no
    reversible error. Therefore, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Porter v. Murray, No. CA-94-433-AM
    (E.D. Va. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like