Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    Dye v. Batten, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Quintis Dye appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various sheriffs and deputies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 4, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Dye v. Batten, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Quintis Dye appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various sheriffs and deputies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 4, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7735

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Quintis Dye appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various sheriffs and deputies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 4, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Dye v. Batten, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Quintis Dye appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various sheriffs and deputies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 4, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7735

    QUINTIS DYE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CHRIS BATTEN, Sheriff; ALEXANDER SINGLETARY,
    Deputy
    Sheriff;
    GREGG
    COLE;
    CLEMINTINE
    THOMPSON; RONALD HEWETT, Sheriff; JANE EVANS,
    Deputy Sheriff; KEVIN HOLDEN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:06-cv-03034-H)

    Submitted:

    December 14, 2006

    Decided:

    December 22, 2006

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Quintis Dye, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Quintis Dye appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

    (2000)

    complaint

    under

    28

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.
    Oct. 4, 2006).

    Dye v. Batten, No. 5:06-cv-03034-H (E.D.N.C.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like