Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Holloman v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Lennell Holloman filed a Section 1983 complaint against Judge Brown in district court, which was dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). Holloman appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6510

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lennell Holloman filed a Section 1983 complaint against Judge Brown in district court, which was dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). Holloman appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Holloman v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lennell Holloman filed a Section 1983 complaint against Judge Brown in district court, which was dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). Holloman appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6510

    LENNELL HOLLOMAN,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JUDGE BROWN, Judge,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2009

    Decided:

    September 24, 2009

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lennell Holloman, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lennell

    Holloman

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915A(b) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and find that

    this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    for

    the

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    district

    court.

    Holloman

    v.

    Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009;


    entered Jan. 22, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like