Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Legare, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Robert Legare filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Legare was not entitled to relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7281

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Legare filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Legare was not entitled to relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Legare, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Legare filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Legare was not entitled to relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7281

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ROBERT W. LEGARE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-212-A, CA-97-567-AM)
    Submitted:

    December 11, 1997

    Decided:

    December 31, 1997

    Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Fred Warren Bennett, CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Washington,
    D.C., for Appellant. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
    STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. United States v. Legare, Nos. CR-93-212-A;
    CA-97-567-AM (E.D. Va. June 4 & 16, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like