Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Dunbar v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Robert Dunbar v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al. The court dismissed Dunbar's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had granted a motion to dismiss one defendant and substitute parties in the case. The appeals court found this was not an appealable final order or interlocutory order, so it dismissed the appeal as interlocutory.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Dunbar v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Robert Dunbar v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al. The court dismissed Dunbar's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had granted a motion to dismiss one defendant and substitute parties in the case. The appeals court found this was not an appealable final order or interlocutory order, so it dismissed the appeal as interlocutory.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6548

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Robert Dunbar v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al. The court dismissed Dunbar's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had granted a motion to dismiss one defendant and substitute parties in the case. The appeals court found this was not an appealable final order or interlocutory order, so it dismissed the appeal as interlocutory.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Dunbar v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Robert Dunbar v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al. The court dismissed Dunbar's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had granted a motion to dismiss one defendant and substitute parties in the case. The appeals court found this was not an appealable final order or interlocutory order, so it dismissed the appeal as interlocutory.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6548

    ROBERT DUNBAR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICE; DAVIS, Doctor at
    Kirkland Reception and Evaluation Center;
    NEIVLLE, Kirkland Reception and Evaluation
    Center; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES (CMS);
    CORRECTIONS OFFICER ADAMS, Officer at Kirkland
    Correctional
    Institution;
    HOWARD
    FREEMAN
    PATTERSON; PATTERSON, Officer at Kirkland Correctional Institution; ANTHONY, Officer at
    Kirkland Correctional Institution; BARBARA
    SKEEN, SCDC Health Resource Service; DOUG
    CATOE, Director of SCDC; PALMETTO HEALTH
    ALLIANCE, d/b/a Palmetto Richland Memorial
    Hospital,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (CA-00-619-2-23AJ)

    Submitted:

    July 26, 2001

    Decided:

    August 2, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Dunbar, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South
    Carolina; Charles Elford Carpenter, Jr., Georgia Anna Mitchell, S.
    Elizabeth Brosnan, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Dunbar appeals the district courts order granting
    Richland Memorial Hospitals motion to dismiss and substituting
    parties.

    We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

    the order is not appealable.

    This court may exercise jurisdiction

    only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (1994); Fed. R.
    Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541
    (1949).

    The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.


    We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like