Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Akinro v. Blake, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Catherine Blake. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court in its June 8, 2007 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Akinro v. Blake, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Catherine Blake. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court in its June 8, 2007 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-08-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1581

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Catherine Blake. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court in its June 8, 2007 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Akinro v. Blake, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Catherine Blake. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court in its June 8, 2007 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1581

    FRANCIS AKINRO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CATHERINE C. BLAKE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv01450-AMD)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2007

    Decided:

    August 28, 2007

    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Francis

    Akinro

    appeals

    dismissing Akinros complaint.


    find no reversible error.

    district

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.


    AMD (D. Md. June 8, 2007).

    the

    Akinro v. Blake, No. 1:07-cv-01450-

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like