Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Willie James Nesmith v. Charles Hill Alton Anderson, M.D. Officer Parker, 74 F.3d 1232, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    Willie James Nesmith filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against Charles Hill, Alton Anderson, and Officer Parker that was denied by the district court. Nesmith appealed the district court's decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-17 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 74 F.3d 1232 Docket: 95-7338

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Willie James Nesmith filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against Charles Hill, Alton Anderson, and Officer Parker that was denied by the district court. Nesmith appealed the district court's decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views1 page

    Willie James Nesmith v. Charles Hill Alton Anderson, M.D. Officer Parker, 74 F.3d 1232, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Willie James Nesmith filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against Charles Hill, Alton Anderson, and Officer Parker that was denied by the district court. Nesmith appealed the district court's decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    74 F.

    3d 1232
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Willie James NESMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Charles HILL; Alton Anderson, M.D.; Officer Parker,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-7338.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
    Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

    Willie James Nesmith, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Nesmith v. Hill, No. CA-95-312 (E.D.N.C. Aug.
    9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like