Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gant v. DEA, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Dr. Allan Gant filed a civil rights action against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and three of its agents. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Gant appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-1508

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dr. Allan Gant filed a civil rights action against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and three of its agents. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Gant appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Gant v. DEA, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dr. Allan Gant filed a civil rights action against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and three of its agents. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Gant appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-1508

    DR. ALLAN L. GANT,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; DOM GRANT, DEA
    Agent; SHERRIE LANHAM, DEA Agent; R. M. YOUNG,
    DEA Agent,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-95-982-2)
    Submitted:

    November 21, 1996

    Decided:

    December 3, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary
    judgment for the Defendants in Grant's civil rights action. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Gant v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, No. CA-95982-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like