Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony Snipe v. Bureau of Prisons, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Anthony Lamar Snipe. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order Snipe sought to appeal, which adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Snipe's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, was not a final order or otherwise appealable. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-10-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6731

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Anthony Lamar Snipe. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order Snipe sought to appeal, which adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Snipe's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, was not a final order or otherwise appealable. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Anthony Snipe v. Bureau of Prisons, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Anthony Lamar Snipe. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order Snipe sought to appeal, which adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Snipe's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, was not a final order or otherwise appealable. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6731

    ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    BUREAU OF PRISONS; MILDRED L. RIVERA,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (8:10-cv-02686-SB)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2011

    Decided:

    October 5, 2011

    Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony
    judges

    report

    Lamar

    and

    Snipe

    seeks

    recommendation

    to
    that

    appeal

    the

    relief

    be

    magistrate
    denied

    on

    Snipes 28 U.S.C.A. 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.


    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
    U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

    The

    order Snipe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an


    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like