Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Munson v. Lappin, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. The appellant, John William Munson, appealed the district court's order pro se. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its order dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6836

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. The appellant, John William Munson, appealed the district court's order pro se. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its order dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Munson v. Lappin, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. The appellant, John William Munson, appealed the district court's order pro se. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its order dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6836

    JOHN WILLIAM MUNSON,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    HARLEY G. LAPPIN,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
    Judge. (CA-97-380-5-HC-BO)
    Submitted:

    August 28, 1997

    Decided:

    September 17, 1997

    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John William Munson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing, without prejudice, his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2241 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record and the district
    court's order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Munson v.
    Lappin, No. CA-97-380-5-HC-BO (E.D.N.C. May 20, 1997). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like