Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Smith v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kevin Smith, an inmate, filed a § 1983 civil rights complaint against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Smith's complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its March 19, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Smith v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Kevin Smith, an inmate, filed a § 1983 civil rights complaint against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Smith's complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its March 19, 1999 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6452

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kevin Smith, an inmate, filed a § 1983 civil rights complaint against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Smith's complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its March 19, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Smith v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kevin Smith, an inmate, filed a § 1983 civil rights complaint against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Smith's complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its March 19, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6452

    KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    MICHAEL W. MOORE; WILLIAM D. CATOE; JAMES L.
    HARVEY; LAURIE F. BESSINGER; JOYCE BROWN;
    THOMAS
    MCCANTS;
    VAUGHN JACKSON;
    ANTHONY
    SARLARDO; M. ASKEW; KENNETH MANIGO,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (CA-98-2490-10-23)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 1999

    Decided:

    June 23, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Kevin Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin Smith appeals the district courts order dismissing his
    42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint without prejudice.
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    accepting the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See Smith v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections

    No. CA-98-2490-10-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like