Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to grant in part and deny in part Mark Allen Jackson's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to grant in part and deny in part Mark Allen Jackson's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-09-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6825

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to grant in part and deny in part Mark Allen Jackson's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to grant in part and deny in part Mark Allen Jackson's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6825

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MARK ALLEN JACKSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (1:99-cr-00421-1)

    Submitted:

    September 16, 2008

    Decided:

    September 23, 2008

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark Allen Jackson, Appellant Pro


    Assistant United States Attorney,
    Appellee.

    Se.
    Stephen P. Learned,
    Alexandria, Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark Allen Jackson appeals from the district courts
    order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction
    of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2000).
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Jackson, No. 1:99-cr-00421-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2008).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like