Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bethea v. Dept of Labor, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    David Bethea filed a complaint with the Department of Labor alleging retaliatory discharge from his job. The Administrative Review Board dismissed his complaint. Bethea then petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for review of the Board's decision. The Court denied the petition, finding that the Board's decision was based on substantial evidence and without legal error. The Court also determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-10-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-1290

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David Bethea filed a complaint with the Department of Labor alleging retaliatory discharge from his job. The Administrative Review Board dismissed his complaint. Bethea then petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for review of the Board's decision. The Court denied the petition, finding that the Board's decision was based on substantial evidence and without legal error. The Court also determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Bethea v. Dept of Labor, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Bethea filed a complaint with the Department of Labor alleging retaliatory discharge from his job. The Administrative Review Board dismissed his complaint. Bethea then petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for review of the Board's decision. The Court denied the petition, finding that the Board's decision was based on substantial evidence and without legal error. The Court also determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-1290

    DAVID BETHEA,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review


    Board. (07-057; 2006-STA-023)

    Submitted:

    September 19, 2008

    Decided:

    October 6, 2008

    Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Bethea, Petitioner Pro Se. John Robert Shortall, OFFICE OF


    THE SOLICITOR GENERAL, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David Bethea seeks review of the Administrative Review
    Boards decision and order dismissing his complaint of retaliatory
    discharge filed pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. 31105 (West 2007 & Supp.
    2008).
    decision

    Our review of the record discloses that the Boards


    is

    based

    upon

    substantial

    evidence

    and

    is

    without

    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for


    the reasons stated by the Board.

    Bethea v. Wallace Trucking Co.,

    No. 07-057 (A.R.B. Dec. 31, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like