Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Vernal Shawn Baker's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court of Appeals also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Vernal Shawn Baker's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court of Appeals also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-10-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7440

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Vernal Shawn Baker's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court of Appeals also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Vernal Shawn Baker's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court of Appeals also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7440

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    VERNAL SHAWN BAKER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District
    Judge. (5:03-cr-00094-01)

    Submitted:

    October 21, 2008

    Decided:

    October 29, 2008

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Vernal Shawn Baker, Appellant Pro Se.


    Miller A. Bushong, III,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Beckley, West Virginia;
    John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston,
    West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Vernal Shawn Baker appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    to

    reduce

    sentence

    3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008).


    record and find no reversible error.

    pursuant

    No.

    dispense

    5:03-cr-00094-01

    with

    oral

    (S.D.W.

    argument

    U.S.C.A.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.


    Baker,

    to

    Va.

    because

    July
    the

    United States v.
    23,
    facts

    2008).
    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like