Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6738

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Certiorari dismissed, April 26, 2010

    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6738

    CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MT. PLEASANT MUNICIPAL COURT,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (2:08-cv-02660-PMD)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2009

    Decided:

    December 28, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Christopher
    CLAWSON &
    Appellee.

    A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Alan Domin,


    STAUBES, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher A. Odom appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Odom v.

    Mt.

    (D.S.C.

    Pleasant

    Mar. 31,
    facts

    2009).

    and

    materials

    Municipal

    legal
    before

    We

    Court,

    dispense

    contentions
    the

    court

    No.
    with

    2:08-cv-02660-PMD
    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like