Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Uti v. Johns, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Falaniko Uti's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Uti v. Johns, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Falaniko Uti's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-01-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7542

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Falaniko Uti's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Uti v. Johns, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Falaniko Uti's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7542

    FALANIKO UTI,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    TRACY JOHNS; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (5:08-hc-02017-H)

    Submitted:

    January 14, 2010

    Decided:

    January 21, 2010

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Falaniko Uti, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Thompson, BUREAU


    OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Falaniko Uti, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2006)
    petition.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Uti v. Johns, No. 5:08-hc-02017-H (E.D.N.C.

    July 27, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like