Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ham v. Cain, 4th Cir. (2008)
Ham v. Cain, 4th Cir. (2008)
Ham v. Cain, 4th Cir. (2008)
No. 08-7022
ANGELO B. HAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER CAIN, SMU, Business Office,
Institution;
L.
MILLER,
Grievance
Correctional Institution,
Lee Correctional
Coordinator,
Lee
Defendants Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(6:08-cv-01764-DCN)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Angelo
B.
Ham
appeals
the
district
courts
order
The
28
U.S.C.
636(b)(1)(B)
(2000).
The
magistrate
judge
review
recommendation.
of
district
court
order
based
upon
the
timely
judges
filing
of
recommendation
specific
is
objections
necessary
to
to
preserve
parties
noncompliance.
have
been
warned
of
the
consequences
of
Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Ham
Accordingly, we deny
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED