Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    McDaniel v. Willett, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Qasim Bilal Al-Amin Bin McDaniel filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Pamunky Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and McDaniel appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied McDaniel's motions for appointment of counsel and for preparation of transcripts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    McDaniel v. Willett, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Qasim Bilal Al-Amin Bin McDaniel filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Pamunky Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and McDaniel appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied McDaniel's motions for appointment of counsel and for preparation of transcripts.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-11-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6391

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Qasim Bilal Al-Amin Bin McDaniel filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Pamunky Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and McDaniel appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied McDaniel's motions for appointment of counsel and for preparation of transcripts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    McDaniel v. Willett, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Qasim Bilal Al-Amin Bin McDaniel filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Pamunky Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and McDaniel appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied McDaniel's motions for appointment of counsel and for preparation of transcripts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6391

    QASIM BILAL AL-AMIN BIN MCDANIEL, a/k/a Eugene McDaniel,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JAMES C. WILLETT, Superintendent, Pamunky Regional Jail; M. A.
    BENNETT, Major, Deputy Superintendent, Pamunky Regional Jail;
    SCKINTO, Sgt., Grievance Officer, Pamunky Regional Jail;
    CLAVEAU, Captain, Programs, Pamunky Regional Jail,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:06-cv-00787-JRS)

    Submitted:

    September 5, 2008

    Decided:

    November 3, 2008

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Qasim Bilal Al-Amin Bin McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ehrich,
    Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Qasim Bilal Al-Amin Bin McDaniel appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000)
    complaint.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    McDaniel v. Willett, No. 3:06-cv-00787-JRS (E.D.

    Va. Mar. 3, 2008).

    Additionally, we deny McDaniels motions for

    appointment of counsel and for preparation of transcripts.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like