Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Patton, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Daniel Patton's motion for a sentence reduction and reconsideration of that order. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders for the reasons stated therein and denied Patton's request for transcripts at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Patton, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Daniel Patton's motion for a sentence reduction and reconsideration of that order. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders for the reasons stated therein and denied Patton's request for transcripts at government expense.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-12-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7183

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Daniel Patton's motion for a sentence reduction and reconsideration of that order. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders for the reasons stated therein and denied Patton's request for transcripts at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Patton, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Daniel Patton's motion for a sentence reduction and reconsideration of that order. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders for the reasons stated therein and denied Patton's request for transcripts at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7183

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MAURICE DANIEL PATTON, a/k/a Fats,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:03-cr-00148-JBF-JEB-1)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2008

    Decided:

    December 1, 2008

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Maurice Daniel Patton, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,


    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Norfolk,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Maurice
    orders

    denying

    Daniel

    his

    Patton

    motion

    for

    appeals
    a

    the

    reduction

    district
    of

    courts

    sentence

    filed

    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration


    of

    that

    order.

    We

    reversible error.

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we find the district court did


    See United

    not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

    States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion
    under 3582(c) is subject to the discretion of the district
    court); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.
    2000).

    Thus, we affirm the district courts orders for the

    reasons stated therein.


    cr-00148-JBF-JEB-01
    further

    deny

    See United States v. Patton, No. 2:03-

    (E.D.

    Pattons

    Governments expense.

    Va.

    June

    request

    5
    for

    &

    June

    24,

    2008).

    transcripts

    at

    We
    the

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like