Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Spence v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Henry Lotson Spence, Sr. filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Spence appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Spence's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6165

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Henry Lotson Spence, Sr. filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Spence appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Spence's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Spence v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Henry Lotson Spence, Sr. filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Spence appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Spence's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6165

    HENRY LOTSON SPENCE, SR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH M. BROOKS,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-00-446)

    Submitted:

    April 12, 2001

    Decided:

    April 26, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tara Louise Casey,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. Spence v. Brooks, No. CA-00-446 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28,
    2000).

    We deny Spences motion for appointment of counsel and

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like