Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Phillips, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Laron Warren Phillips appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The district court's denial of Phillips' motion was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6336

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Laron Warren Phillips appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The district court's denial of Phillips' motion was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Phillips, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Laron Warren Phillips appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The district court's denial of Phillips' motion was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6336

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LARON WARREN PHILLIPS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:01-cr-00127-JBF; 2:05-cv-637)

    Submitted: July 20, 2006

    Decided: July 26, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Laron Warren Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,


    Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Laron Warren Phillips appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion to compel a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See United States v. Phillips, Nos. 2:01-cr-00127-JBF;

    2:05-cv-637 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2006).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like