Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Walker v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in Kevin D. Walker's civil rights lawsuit. Walker had sued police officers and others alleging violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion granting summary judgment to the defendants.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7719

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in Kevin D. Walker's civil rights lawsuit. Walker had sued police officers and others alleging violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion granting summary judgment to the defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Walker v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in Kevin D. Walker's civil rights lawsuit. Walker had sued police officers and others alleging violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion granting summary judgment to the defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7719

    KEVIN D. WALKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    AUTHUR SMITH, Department of Police; S. L. SCHULTZ, #2552; G.
    BRANDT, #1537; KNODE, Ofc.; DIETZ, Ofc.; CINDY MESSER SMITH,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:07-cv-02717-RDB)

    Submitted:

    January 28, 2009

    Decided:

    February 9, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin D. Walker, Appellant Pro


    Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Se.

    Matthew

    Douglas

    Peter,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin

    D.

    Walker

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. 1983


    (2000) civil action.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See Walker v. Smith, No. 1:07-cv-02717-

    RDB (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like