Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. White, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Christopher White appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling. When a sentence is within the original sentencing guidelines, a district court cannot reduce the sentence below the amended guideline range in a § 3582(c) resentencing hearing. As White's sentence was within the original guidelines, the district court did not err in denying his motion to reduce the sentence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. White, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Christopher White appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling. When a sentence is within the original sentencing guidelines, a district court cannot reduce the sentence below the amended guideline range in a § 3582(c) resentencing hearing. As White's sentence was within the original guidelines, the district court did not err in denying his motion to reduce the sentence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7947

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Christopher White appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling. When a sentence is within the original sentencing guidelines, a district court cannot reduce the sentence below the amended guideline range in a § 3582(c) resentencing hearing. As White's sentence was within the original guidelines, the district court did not err in denying his motion to reduce the sentence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. White, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Christopher White appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling. When a sentence is within the original sentencing guidelines, a district court cannot reduce the sentence below the amended guideline range in a § 3582(c) resentencing hearing. As White's sentence was within the original guidelines, the district court did not err in denying his motion to reduce the sentence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7947

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CHRISTOPHER WHITE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William D. Quarles, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:98-cr-00358-WDQ-8)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2009

    Decided:

    March 6, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Christopher White, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jamie M. Bennett,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher

    White

    appeals

    from

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to


    18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. White,

    No. 1:98-cr-00358-WDQ-8 (D. Md. filed Sept. 2 & entered Sept. 3,


    2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.
    2009) (When a sentence is within the guidelines applicable at
    the time of the original sentencing, in an 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)
    resentencing
    reduce

    range.).
    legal
    before

    hearing,

    defendant's

    district

    sentence

    judge
    below

    is
    the

    not

    authorized

    amended

    to

    guideline

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like