Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Vargas, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hector Vargas's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Vargas appealed the district court's ruling, but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the reasons provided by the district court for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7980

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hector Vargas's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Vargas appealed the district court's ruling, but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the reasons provided by the district court for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Vargas, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hector Vargas's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Vargas appealed the district court's ruling, but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the reasons provided by the district court for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7980

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    HECTOR VARGAS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
    W. Earl Britt,
    Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00096-BR-1)

    Submitted:

    February 18, 2010

    Decided:

    February 25, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Hector Vargas, Appellant Pro Se.


    J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant
    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Hector

    Vargas

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18


    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. Vargas,

    No. 7:01-cr-00096-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2009).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like