Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    Timothy Coles v. K. McNeely, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Timothy Lee Coles appealed a district court order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the district court. Oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Timothy Coles v. K. McNeely, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views3 pages
    Timothy Lee Coles appealed a district court order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the district court. Oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7197

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Timothy Lee Coles appealed a district court order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the district court. Oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views3 pages

    Timothy Coles v. K. McNeely, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Timothy Lee Coles appealed a district court order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the district court. Oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7197

    TIMOTHY LEE COLES,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    K. MCNEELY, Inmate Hearing Officer, Buckingham Correctional
    Center; L. T. EDMONDS, Warden of Buckingham Correctional
    Center (BKCC); G. K. WASHINGTON, Central Region Regional
    Director; L. MICKELSON, Food Service Head Supervisor,
    Sussex II State Prison; L. SHAW, Correctional Institutional
    Rehabilitation Counselor, Sussex II State Prison; J.
    HARRIS, Unit Manager of Housing Unit 2, Sussex II State
    Prison; RODRIQUEZ, Inmate Hearing Officer, Sussex II State
    Prison; D. EVERETT, Warden, Sussex II State Prison; V.
    PURMAN, Correctional Officer, Sussex II State Prison; V.
    KNIGHT, Correctional Officer, Sussex II State Prison; S.
    GRAY, Sgt., Sussex II State Prison; L. THOMAS, Lt., Sussex
    II State Prison; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Eastern Regional
    Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:11-cv-00130-REP)

    Submitted:

    January 30, 2012

    Decided:

    Before AGEE, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    February 14, 2012

    Timothy Lee Coles, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Timothy Lee Coles appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Coles

    Aug. 23,

    2011).

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    v.

    McNeely,

    We

    dispense

    contentions
    the

    No.

    court

    3:11-cv-00130-REP

    with

    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    (E.D.

    Va.

    because

    the

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like