Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mohammad Afzal v. Malik Aslam, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a fraud claim brought by Mohammad Afzal against Malik A. Aslam. The district court dismissed Afzal's fraud claim and the appellate court affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1718

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a fraud claim brought by Mohammad Afzal against Malik A. Aslam. The district court dismissed Afzal's fraud claim and the appellate court affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Mohammad Afzal v. Malik Aslam, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a fraud claim brought by Mohammad Afzal against Malik A. Aslam. The district court dismissed Afzal's fraud claim and the appellate court affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1718

    MOHAMMAD AFZAL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MALIK A. ASLAM,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, Senior District
    Judge. (1:11-cv-00395-WMN)

    Submitted:

    February 23, 2012

    Decided:

    February 27, 2012

    Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alexander M. Chanthunya, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant.


    James
    E.
    Garland,
    FERGUSON,
    SCHETELICH
    &
    BALLEW,
    P.A.,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mohammad

    Afzal

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    dismissing his fraud claim against Malik A. Aslam.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    we affirm the district courts order.
    cv-00395-WMN (D. Md. June 15, 2011).

    order

    We have

    Accordingly,

    Afzal v. Aslam, No. 1:11We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like