Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Walter L. Green v. R.L. Palmer, Det. R.F. Liburd, V.C.U. Security Personnel, 69 F.3d 532, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an appeals court decision from 1995 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by Walter L. Green against two law enforcement officers. The appeals court summarized that it found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief to Green. In a brief, one sentence per curiam opinion, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling and reasoning. It also noted that oral arguments would not further aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 69 F.3d 532 Docket: 95-7266

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an appeals court decision from 1995 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by Walter L. Green against two law enforcement officers. The appeals court summarized that it found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief to Green. In a brief, one sentence per curiam opinion, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling and reasoning. It also noted that oral arguments would not further aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Walter L. Green v. R.L. Palmer, Det. R.F. Liburd, V.C.U. Security Personnel, 69 F.3d 532, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an appeals court decision from 1995 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by Walter L. Green against two law enforcement officers. The appeals court summarized that it found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief to Green. In a brief, one sentence per curiam opinion, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling and reasoning. It also noted that oral arguments would not further aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    69 F.

    3d 532

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Walter L. GREEN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    R.L. PALMER, Det.; R.F. Liburd, V.C.U. Security Personnel,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-7266.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Oct. 30, 1995.

    Walter L. Green, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court.* Green v. Palmer, No. CA-95-129-2 (E.D.Va.
    Feb. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    Because Appellant's claims also necessarily challenge the validity of his


    conviction, his action would also be subject to dismissal under Heck v.
    Humphrey, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594 (U.S.1994)

    You might also like