Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Spalding, 4th Cir. (1996)
United States v. Spalding, 4th Cir. (1996)
United States v. Spalding, 4th Cir. (1996)
No. 96-6327
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-105)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Spalding, No. CR-90-105 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED