Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Joseph Gray, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Joseph Gray, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Joseph Gray, 4th Cir. (2014)
No. 13-4716
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:12-cr-00188-FDW-DSC-14)
Submitted:
Decided:
March 4, 2014
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Darnell Gray pled guilty, pursuant to a Federal
Rule
of
Criminal
Procedure
11(c)(1)(C)
plea
agreement,
to
aid
of
racketeering
1959(a)(5) (2012).
activity,
in
violation
of
18
U.S.C.
On appeal, counsel
stating
appeal,
but
voluntary.
that
there
questioning
are
whether
no
meritorious
Grays
plea
grounds
for
knowing
and
was
supplemental
brief,
but
has
not
filed
one.
The
Government
error occurred, that the error was plain, and that the error
affected his substantial rights.
requirements,
error
correction
of
the
remains
within
[the
public
reputation
of
judicial
proceedings.
Id.
(internal
in
knowingly
accepting
and
Grays
guilty
voluntarily.
plea,
We
which
therefore
Gray
entered
affirm
Grays
convictions.
Subject to narrow exceptions, a defendant who agrees
to
and
receives
particular
sentence
pursuant
to
Rule
18 U.S.C. 3742(a)
(2012); United States v. Calderon, 428 F.3d 928, 932 (10th Cir.
2005).
Moreover,
the
incorrect
sentence
was
not
imposed
as
result
of
an
parties
agreement
and
not
on
the
district
courts
may
move
representation.
in
this
court
for
leave
to
withdraw
from
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART