Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Torrence, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Torrence's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appellate court denied Torrence a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Torrence's § 2255 motion and motion to reconsider. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Torrence, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Torrence's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appellate court denied Torrence a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Torrence's § 2255 motion and motion to reconsider. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6831

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Torrence's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appellate court denied Torrence a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Torrence's § 2255 motion and motion to reconsider. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Torrence, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Torrence's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appellate court denied Torrence a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Torrence's § 2255 motion and motion to reconsider. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6831

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RONALD TORRENCE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-94-1, CA-95-100-P)
    Submitted:

    December 12, 1996

    Decided:

    December 19, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ronald Torrence, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104132, 110 Stat. 1214, and the denial of his motion to reconsider. We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Torrence,

    Nos.

    CR-94-1;

    CA-95-100-P

    (W.D.N.C. May 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the


    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like