Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Culp v. United States, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Harvey Culp, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Culp. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. It grants Culp's request to proceed in forma pauperis but affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 2003 decision. The appellate court dispenses with oral arguments as the relevant facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Culp v. United States, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Harvey Culp, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Culp. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. It grants Culp's request to proceed in forma pauperis but affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 2003 decision. The appellate court dispenses with oral arguments as the relevant facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7845

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Harvey Culp, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Culp. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. It grants Culp's request to proceed in forma pauperis but affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 2003 decision. The appellate court dispenses with oral arguments as the relevant facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Culp v. United States, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Harvey Culp, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Culp. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. It grants Culp's request to proceed in forma pauperis but affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 2003 decision. The appellate court dispenses with oral arguments as the relevant facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7845

    HARVEY CULP, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES PAROLE
    COMMISSION; PROSECUTING ATTORNEY; WOODROW
    JONES, Judge, "Judge of Judgment"; JOHN DOE,
    Judge; MERCER BLANKENSHIP, JR., Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-03-268-3-MU2)

    Submitted:

    December 9, 2004

    Decided:

    December 14, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Harvey Culp, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Harvey Culp, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed

    in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    See Culp v. United States, No. CA-03-268-3-MU2 (W.D.N.C.,

    Sept. 26, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like