Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ameen Kareem Abdullah v. Nathan A. Rice, Warden Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, 807 F.2d 175, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found no merit to the appeal after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The dispositive issues had been recently and authoritatively decided, so the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-12-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 807 F.2d 175 Docket: 86-6695

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found no merit to the appeal after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The dispositive issues had been recently and authoritatively decided, so the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views1 page

    Ameen Kareem Abdullah v. Nathan A. Rice, Warden Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, 807 F.2d 175, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found no merit to the appeal after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The dispositive issues had been recently and authoritatively decided, so the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    807 F.

    2d 175
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ameen Kareem ABDULLAH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Nathan A. RICE, Warden; Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney
    General
    of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-6695.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 19, 1986.
    Decided Dec. 10, 1986.

    Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.


    Ameen Kareem Abdullah, appellant pro se.
    Barry Steven McNeill, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal
    from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal,
    dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Abdullah v. Rice, C/A No. 83-861-C-C-M (W.D.N.C., July 7,
    1986).

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like