Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • El-Amin v. Young, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Melvin Abdullah El-Amin filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against Joseph H. Young, a senior United States district court judge, which was denied by the district court. 2) El-Amin appealed the district court's denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6881

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Melvin Abdullah El-Amin filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against Joseph H. Young, a senior United States district court judge, which was denied by the district court. 2) El-Amin appealed the district court's denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    El-Amin v. Young, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Melvin Abdullah El-Amin filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against Joseph H. Young, a senior United States district court judge, which was denied by the district court. 2) El-Amin appealed the district court's denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6881

    MELVIN ABDULLAH EL-AMIN,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior United States District
    Court Judge,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-1647-CCB)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 23, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Melvin Abdullah El-Amin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    mandamus petition under 28 U.S.C. 1361 (1994). We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. El-Amin v. Young, No. CA-97-1647-CCB (D. Md. May 30, 1997).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like